The
Perils of the First Amendment – Free Speech
Since O.D.D. [oppositional defiant disorder] has many
political ramifications, one may suggest this is government’s way of inventing
loose and vague definitions such as this one related to the alleged illness of
ODD and apply it to a threat level connected to three areas of concern –
government compliance – political resistance – behavioral disobedience.
Each carry a sanction that would allow the government
to restrict speech, movement and other “rights” under the constitution based on
being perceived a threat to the orderly operation of the government.
In fact, each of these illnesses can impose
restrictions on other “rights” as well such as the 2nd Amendment right to carry
a firearm. They could in fact, leak into all our Bill of Rights implied and
written in our Constitution.
The list would be endless if government were allowed
to impose such bans on aircraft travel, passports, job applications or
employment opportunities etc.
Using this approach is not new – as a matter of fact,
it was used by the communists in Russia that allowed actions to be taken that
defied our Constitutional conscious and created a wave of systems that imposed
psychological and physical barriers upon people who were identified to be
problematic politically.
In a 1959 speech, Nikita Khrushchev made the following
remark: “Can there be diseases, nervous diseases among certain people in the
communist society? Evidently there can be. If that is so, then there also will
be offenses which are characteristic of people with abnormal minds.
To those who might start calling for opposition to
communism on this ‘basis,’ we say that now, too, there are people who fight
against communism, but clearly the mental state of such people is not normal.”
Under the current government, if President Obama were
to order psychiatrists to immediately look for signs of insanity or instability,
he would successfully deploy and implement his mass gun control program through
this means of using medical and psychological warfare against the people,
disabling them from guns and under government’s custody and care.
Once government is satisfied with the criteria for
such illness, it will be likely that any opposition to a specific religion,
e.g. Christianity or Islam could in fact be an indicator of being O.D.D in
mindset.
America would therefore, find a way to institutionalize
all those mentally ill and who have been identified or targeted as
anti-government or political party orientation thus banned or barred from
certain activities or denied rights under our form of Constitutional
protection.
No comments:
Post a Comment