A journal of a wimpy man who learns from the hard knocks of life and changes his ways to be better.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
Pro-Islamic Pandering in the New World
Pro-Islamic
Pandering needs damage control
The
world is on fire and everybody has noticed it. Between the turmoil in Germany,
Sweden and other European countries who opened up their borders to Syrian
refugees and other Islamic preaching Muslims escaping from their own country
because of civil war and other conflict, the world is rocking.
Whether
or not this damage control is manageable is based on the spreads allowed by
government to cover up the negative and brutal stories escaping from the mouths
of rape and sexual assault victims. In addition to this kind of animalistic
behaviors, there are increased incidents of disturbances, homicides, work
disruptions and other protests against the non-Muslim world.
One
has to wonder, how is this backdraft of President’s Obama’s will to bring a
quarter of a million Muslims to the United States work out and how can we find
an amicable and reasonable plan to manage the upcoming conflict and
multicultural strife that will result in a civil war or political pushback from
the population.
Damage
control will consist of turning these tales of violence around and blame the
victims for their provocative behaviors that triggered such acts as rape,
groping and other sexual misconduct. Blaming the victim has always worked
effectively in the past and put the burden on those women violated
Second,
the government will attempt to invoke, restrict or censor some of the negative
feedback of these kind of occurrences in countries now saturated with Muslim
refugees and running amuck. Decisive action will include putting restrictions
on social media posting, criticism or even discuss such vile attacks as they
happened in Cologne Germany and Oslo Sweden.
This
kind of behavior has spread throughout Europe and it is suspect how much longer
European are willing to put up with this kind of attack on their own society
and cultures.
Third,
the government will outlaw “hate speech” or other criticism against Muslim
refugees labeled as “elder women and children, asylum seekers and migrants
looking to live in peace. Laws will be enforced to stifle any loud speech
against such groups as already demonstrated by our own Attorney General Lynch.
The
civilized world as we have known it to exist is now under siege by the vilest
of foreign miscreants – renegade and despicable extremists of the Quran and
Islam faith using their religion as the means to destroy what our world has
built over the many centuries of democracy and freedom to choose their own
religions.
It
is likely the United Nations through the United States and the European Union,
shall pledge support in the cooperative censorship of all criticism of Muslims
everywhere. The more citizens express their fear; the more pressure will be
applied on society to quell the revolution of anti-Islamic sentiments.
Monday, January 11, 2016
O.D.D. - conclusion
Defiance
of Authority
If you have read any of my O.D.D. [oppositional defiance
disorder] write-ups, then you can see how the manipulation of mental illness
can be used as an evidence-based system by corporate or government sources to
provide a wide continuum of intentional or unintentional abuses that may lead
to suicides if pushed to the limits of capabilities and intentions
This scope of a very difficult and extensive work by various
professionals in the medical and psychiatric fields should not overshadow the
legitimate use of genuine psychological services and psychotropic medication to
treat real mental illness.
The fact is this type of psychiatry is very useful in legitimate
diagnosis or given a real and effective treatment for those who suffer of such
severe mental conditions. This is written clearly to show no intent of creating
misunderstandings that assert the scope of mental illness treatment is either
false or bogus.
It is and can be helpful in alleviating symptoms of
seriously mentally ill persons and allow people afflicted by such an illness to
lead fairly normal lives that would otherwise be out of reach for them. What is
important to remember and realize is how such services and treatment can be
abused and misused for the wrong reasons.
Dealing with the human mind is an intricate process
that can be easily tampered with or without drugs. Brainwashing is a good
example as cults are formed easily by those who have the influence over others.
Using medication or false mental illness diagnoses is a dangerous revelation
and development to accept and understand.
Changing personality traits to reduce authority
defiance is not normal but yet, under most scientific terms, not abnormal as
well. One such examples cited is the instance of cased where mass murderers
were prescribed psychotropic drugs before they acted out and killed many
innocents.
Doctors should be held accountable for such
mistreatment however, under the current law, that is not happening. On the
matter of changing the mindset of those diagnosed with O.D.D. and getting them
to become less resistant to authority and follow at will, the use of such malpractice
is a slippery slope with very little legal consequences.
This is because most enter into the treatment
voluntarily unaware of the motive behind their treatment. Since there were
assessed legitimately, their treatment appears to be legitimate as well. Whether or not this is harmful to the Freedom
of Speech has not been determined yet as there are no such cases filed in the
federal appeal courts or the Supreme Court to make such a ruling.
Secondly, because these individuals, scientists,
professors, or others who have demonstrated an anti-authoritarian behavior
towards corporate or government business, labeling them to be mentally
discredits much of their words, actions and criticism as they appear to be
assessed legitimately for intentional purposes – to label them with psychiatric
diagnosis to slander or erase their credibility and or reduce their rejection
of all authorities they have to deal with in their scope of work.
Certainly, this subject or theory is a legitimate
cause to investigate or explore the process used to address anti-authoritarians
in our society and question whether they are healthy or being treated illegitimately
by existing authorities e.g. corporate or government related who see fit to use
such a process to undermine liberty and other freedoms.
Using mental illness and chemical restraints and controls
for the sake of providing a complete need for national security or other tasks
that are predictably illegal or immoral to the persons diagnosed and treated to
reduce their objection to such effort is a basic violation of our human and
civil rights even in the name of the advance of science or national security
Sunday, January 10, 2016
Invasive Species need Moderation on Immigration Plans
The
Invasion of Radicalized Muslims
Background
and Problem –
Muslims are native to the
Middle East, Africa, South Asia and now, through the migration of their
religion and movements as mass refugees, Europe. Muslims come in many different
ethnic groups and vary in religious beliefs, customs and practices.
Regardless how you feel
about Muslims, they are the largest group of people on the planet and are
growing at a rapid rate with invasive numbers to non-Muslim countries. Muslims
have never been contained by their own regional or geographical nature or
political status. Muslims have been imported by numerous countries on the pretense
or political agendas of asylum and sanctuary status.
They have tried to escape the persecution, the wars
and violence and the cruelty of their own governments for decades now and have
become abundant in parts of the world never used or inhabited by them creating
conflict and violence as the assimilation process has been anything but
peaceful.
Muslim politically grow faster and fiercer than other
populations. This is mainly based on their religious beliefs that forces them
to engage in Islam more intensely and more frequently in their personal lives
than other religions.
Muslim families grow much faster and much bigger than
most non-Muslim families as their numbers are not contained and appear to have
a dramatic effect on the communities around them. Most Muslims rely on their
own for sustainability and progress.
Muslim populations have increased exponentially in the
world. Already the largest single group of populace they are all represented by
their religion, Islam, and pose a threat to native populations because of their
difference in culture, values and living styles. Their range has been extended
with help from governments offering them housing and assistance via the refugee
programs in place.
Non-Muslims are frightened of the Muslim way – their fear
has turned to hate and anger towards their presence and how the radicalized
Muslims act and impose their strict religious values on their own with dire
consequences, including death if not followed. Most of this fear is based on
the irrational behaviors associated with those Muslims who carry out acts of
criminality and terrorism while living in the host country that has accepted
them voluntarily and now experience conflict wherever the population has outgrown
the native inhabitants
Since these radicalized Muslims act or carry out deeds
that are criminal and violent in nature, they carry with them a strong stigma
of being undesirable and unwanted due to their lessened value to live in
harmony as their presence poses a substantial risk of harm or other perils
including rape or sexual assaults, aggravated battery with weapons and knives
and homicides
As American stakeholders, the USA has a responsibility
to protect native groups from any harm or injury from the Muslim refugees
slated to arrive in this country in mass numbers. The Refugee plan and
strategies for controlling this influx of a different culture should include
basic life history research that points out the risks of non-Muslims living in
harmony with Muslims and their framework of life.
There is an imminent threat posed by the rapid
introduction of Muslim families in non-Muslim areas. There must be organized
efforts performed and executed by government to assure an equality of life
under our Constitution and refrain from imposing or interceding the laws of
Sharia Law as these laws do not conform with our own Bill of Rights and judicial
system.
The best solution is to reduce the number of Muslims
allowed to enter so that their culture and the American culture can grow in
harmony without any critical side-effects that create more misunderstandings
and political pressure to push the ideology of Muslims on non-Muslims and vice
versa.
The strategic plan should reduce numbers already
allocated or designed and cut-back the frequency of such immigration plans to
sustain positive growth and multicultural understandings.
Invasive Species - Moderation in Immigration Numbers in Required
The
Invasion of Radicalized Muslims
Background
and Problem –
Muslims are native to the
Middle East, Africa, South Asia and now, through the migration of their
religion and movements as mass refugees, Europe. Muslims come in many different
ethnic groups and vary in religious beliefs, customs and practices.
Regardless how you feel
about Muslims, they are the largest group of people on the planet and are
growing at a rapid rate with invasive numbers to non-Muslim countries. Muslims
have never been contained by their own regional or geographical nature or
political status. Muslims have been imported by numerous countries on the pretense
or political agendas of asylum and sanctuary status.
They have tried to escape the persecution, the wars
and violence and the cruelty of their own governments for decades now and have
become abundant in parts of the world never used or inhabited by them creating
conflict and violence as the assimilation process has been anything but
peaceful.
Muslim politically grow faster and fiercer than other
populations. This is mainly based on their religious beliefs that forces them
to engage in Islam more intensely and more frequently in their personal lives
than other religions.
Muslim families grow much faster and much bigger than
most non-Muslim families as their numbers are not contained and appear to have
a dramatic effect on the communities around them. Most Muslims rely on their
own for sustainability and progress.
Muslim populations have increased exponentially in the
world. Already the largest single group of populace they are all represented by
their religion, Islam, and pose a threat to native populations because of their
difference in culture, values and living styles. Their range has been extended
with help from governments offering them housing and assistance via the refugee
programs in place.
Non-Muslims are frightened of the Muslim way – their fear
has turned to hate and anger towards their presence and how the radicalized
Muslims act and impose their strict religious values on their own with dire
consequences, including death if not followed. Most of this fear is based on
the irrational behaviors associated with those Muslims who carry out acts of
criminality and terrorism while living in the host country that has accepted
them voluntarily and now experience conflict wherever the population has outgrown
the native inhabitants
Since these radicalized Muslims act or carry out deeds
that are criminal and violent in nature, they carry with them a strong stigma
of being undesirable and unwanted due to their lessened value to live in
harmony as their presence poses a substantial risk of harm or other perils
including rape or sexual assaults, aggravated battery with weapons and knives
and homicides
As American stakeholders, the USA has a responsibility
to protect native groups from any harm or injury from the Muslim refugees
slated to arrive in this country in mass numbers. The Refugee plan and
strategies for controlling this influx of a different culture should include
basic life history research that points out the risks of non-Muslims living in
harmony with Muslims and their framework of life.
There is an imminent threat posed by the rapid
introduction of Muslim families in non-Muslim areas. There must be organized
efforts performed and executed by government to assure an equality of life
under our Constitution and refrain from imposing or interceding the laws of
Sharia Law as these laws do not conform with our own Bill of Rights and judicial
system.
The best solution is to reduce the number of Muslims
allowed to enter so that their culture and the American culture can grow in
harmony without any critical side-effects that create more misunderstandings
and political pressure to push the ideology of Muslims on non-Muslims and vice
versa.
The strategic plan should reduce numbers already
allocated or designed and cut-back the frequency of such immigration plans to
sustain positive growth and multicultural understandings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)