Situational
Morality in Correctional Officers
By Carl R.
ToersBijns, former deputy warden, ASPC Eyman, Florence, AZ
Situational morality
is a 24 /7 issue and concern for those that are exposed to opportunities to do
something wrong whether on duty or off duty. I agree that being human is a
major element of the formula but the resolution or answer lies in the manner
you were brought up and with what values you base your right or wrong on and
how it impacts your behavior under certain situations.
We all have to take
personal responsibility for our own actions and being human does not excuse you
from deviating from your values, the laws, your professional oath or your personal
principles.
Compromising your personal
moral values and workplace ethics leads to other major flaws in doing your job.
Compromising any task, role or decision impedes your abilities to perform
according to your oath as a peace officer puts other people in danger.
The consequences
outweigh the need to do so in most cases but that does not appear to stop some
from committing the act. The severity in receiving possible sanctions e.g.
suspension, termination, conviction of a misdemeanor or felony crime should
halt you in your tracks but as it has been demonstrated many times over, it doesn’t
seem to stop those who take the risks of breaking the rules and disregard the
purposes of such rules.
First off, one must
distinguish the difference between absolute morality and situational morality.
Being human is being mortal thus room for error is given as humans. It is fair
to say that to obtain “absolute morality” is impossible as a human being. It’s
a concept that can be vigorously debated but is likely to reveal flaws in the
concept or expectations since it would require humans to be flawless in nature.
The main difference
between absolute morality and situational morality is the fact that situational
concepts deals exclusively with an individual’s dealings with life and its
temptations. What is valid temptation for one is another one’s vice and
deterrent to stay on the straight and narrow sort of speak. It is fair to say
that as humans, we will act according to how it benefits us.
The key to this
scenario are the words such as “however”, “but” or “unless” that makes morality
a situational one for individuals and allows their minds to justify the acts
although they can be contrary to common sense or internal moral feelings. Hence
the words “greed” and “corrupt” comes to mind and the scenario has been changed
where the act to permit an act is justified by the means and the need
self-imposed by the individual or a group of individuals.
One could argue that
our moral values are infused or originated by the moral inclinations of our
cultural upbringings. However there is a distinct difference between cultural
morality and situational morality issues as one is basically a socialist
viewpoint or values and the other is based on personal or righteous viewpoints
thus they could be in conflict with each other as one occupies the same space
of the other. One can see how this conflict results in a disagreement and the
difference between right and wrong. Therefore, it could be said that
situational morality is or can be a derivative of the moral conditions in every
sense of the word and can be copied.
Politicians use this
concept of situational morality to cover the “good for all or many” while in
fact, it may be self-serving and criminal in nature.
Correctional officers
may use this scenario scheme to justify the use of force or develop a
relationship with an inmate that breaches the security of the facility thus
under certain circumstances, they are “right” in their own mindset at the time
and fail to see the rational or irrational misbehaviors other see.
Therefore it is the
personal gain or outcome of such situational moral confrontations that
determine whether it was right or wrong and not the basic human instinct to
follow individual societal or personal philosophies, principles or ethics is
such cases.
It has been said often
that if it makes you happy “do it” but then, this rule should be followed up
with “what makes you happy” should conform with your personal values, ethical
obligations and principles developed over your lifetime.
Hopefully these basic
instincts, feelings, inferences and ideas are instilled by good parenting,
educational experiences, basic and advanced job related training and
development skills and trainers or mentors that shaped or guided your thinking
into the positive light rather than the darkness distinguishing the difference
between right and wrong with a clear line rather than an invisible and blurred
one.
November 16, 2012
