Mass Muslim Immigration - Part II

Evolution of Mass Muslim Immigration into America
Part II

In order to reduce, avoid or compromise conflict, there has to be a split sovereignty and produce two different constitutions or one constitution that is amended to declare Sharia law as to read, “sovereignty belongs to Allah or God alone” (as opposed, to “sovereignty of the people,” as per constitution of most democracies.

 

This act, by itself separated Pakistan from India’s form of government. This kind of adaptation in the United States would cause traditional and political havoc or chaos and ending in a revolution. Such a division would drive religious intolerance beyond reasonable and peaceable limits as in order to enforce such a constitution, Muslim National Guard or militia would be instructed to kill, convert and force out non-Muslims in order to advance their own religious preferences.

 

Other devout practicing Muslims would be pressured to do the same and follow Sharia laws and religious beliefs. Indoctrination would be prioritized and young impressionable children would be targets for new practicing Muslims following the tenets of Islam. In turn, they would have to serve in their militia with a transformation inconsistent with western culture and laws.

 

Since the field of education is primary in their role to be dominant and educated, the possibilities of Muslim students attaining doctorates and degrees in engineering and technology will be significant in our national security realm of our utilities, transportation and weaponry research as well as space development.

 

No matter what field or educational background they choose, the expectation will require Islamic populations to impose a strict application of Sharia and history has shown that more than 80 per cent of the Muslim world is in favor of harsh Sharia-driven penalties such as stoning those who commit adultery and many more crimes that force them to comply with these rigid laws enforced from within while still accountable to another standard outside their culture or communities.

 

The portrayal of the Sharia as a “divine” law necessitates its interpretation by clerics, who now wield enormous control and authority over Muslim communities. Hence, the regressive background of the clerics may cause them to do things against their will or individual career plans.

This will be likened to having an effect of over-regulating young Muslims and hampering their individual ability to create wealth and explore and serve at the mercy of these dominant leaders within their communities. One can see frustration building as there are double standards to live by depending where you lived and who controls your daily lives.

 

Another Sharia influenced factor is wealth or the creation of wealth. In the Muslim communities, the affluent hardly ever pay any taxes. In fact, these wealthy individuals may refuse to pay taxes to our federal government claiming sovereignty and independent control of their assets and wealth or property. This discouraged parity and equitable taxation revenue streams and discriminates the rich versus the poor.

 

All traditional schools of Islamic jurisprudence, too, teach subjugation of non-Muslims through jihad. This will hamper individual governance efforts to be equal and since it is stemmed from the foundational texts of Islam, it suggests that it would also stunt development and foster resentment that leads to the fostering of extremism.

 

On the other side of this conflict was a large improvement of educational and resource development in India that created a higher level of income and education close to the rest of the western world.

 

This perceived disparity could be a driving factor to foster radicalization as one group pits their hardships or discrimination on another and begin to wage jihad to restore the inequity of their existence within another country which in this case is the United States.

 

Resentment is often misunderstood for admiration or envy this created conflict leads to war and violence. In order to provide some parity with Muslim needs or “admiration” demands, our government would have to invest billions in financing new mosques, Islamic cultural centers, universities and honor religious texts prepared by the Muslim clerics to ensure compliance with Islam and Sharia law.

 

There are no indications that all Muslims immigrated to the United States would cut ties with their ancestors or families still in the Middle East or elsewhere in Europe settling in as refugees just like them. Most local Muslims or their converts shall likely maintain continuous economical and emotional links with their past.

 

Based upon the previous discussion of Sharia, there should be an inverse correlation between its popularity and socio-economic development. This is particularly relevant in Arabic speaking nations, where Sharia is interwoven into the fabric of the society.

 

Therefore, it is not unexpected or altogether surprising that we will see massive demonstrations by educated young Muslim people frustrated by un-employment, underemployment in scores of Muslim dominated communities or localities.

 

Although the adherence to the strict Sharia laws and Islam practices would deny them the freedom and privileged others in the United States enjoy, they would be restricted by law to apply or attain such efforts to break Sharia law and find jobs suitable to their own taste yet in turn, they will blame the government form of governance for their lack or socio-economic opportunities and claim mismanagement towards Muslims.

 

Specifically, unless the commerce sector of the United States changes their fundamental means to produce food, manufacture supplies or equipment, bank with Muslim controlled financial establishments and other daily commerce transactions, their long term economic growth will stifle and never achieve long term economic growth compared to the non-Muslim world even if this world exists within another world.