Evolution of Mass Muslim
Immigration into America
Part II
Part II
In
order to reduce, avoid or compromise conflict, there has to be a split sovereignty
and produce two different constitutions or one constitution that is amended to
declare Sharia law as to read, “sovereignty belongs to Allah or God alone” (as
opposed, to “sovereignty of the people,” as per constitution of most
democracies.
This
act, by itself separated Pakistan from India’s form of government. This kind of
adaptation in the United States would cause traditional and political havoc or
chaos and ending in a revolution. Such a division would drive religious
intolerance beyond reasonable and peaceable limits as in order to enforce such
a constitution, Muslim National Guard or militia would be instructed to kill,
convert and force out non-Muslims in order to advance their own religious
preferences.
Other
devout practicing Muslims would be pressured to do the same and follow Sharia
laws and religious beliefs. Indoctrination would be prioritized and young
impressionable children would be targets for new practicing Muslims following
the tenets of Islam. In turn, they would have to serve in their militia with a
transformation inconsistent with western culture and laws.
Since
the field of education is primary in their role to be dominant and educated,
the possibilities of Muslim students attaining doctorates and degrees in
engineering and technology will be significant in our national security realm
of our utilities, transportation and weaponry research as well as space
development.
No
matter what field or educational background they choose, the expectation will
require Islamic populations to impose a strict application of Sharia and
history has shown that more than 80 per cent of the Muslim world is in favor of
harsh Sharia-driven penalties such as stoning those who commit adultery and
many more crimes that force them to comply with these rigid laws enforced from
within while still accountable to another standard outside their culture or
communities.
The
portrayal of the Sharia as a “divine” law necessitates its interpretation by
clerics, who now wield enormous control and authority over Muslim communities. Hence,
the regressive background of the clerics may cause them to do things against
their will or individual career plans.
This
will be likened to having an effect of over-regulating young Muslims and
hampering their individual ability to create wealth and explore and serve at
the mercy of these dominant leaders within their communities. One can see
frustration building as there are double standards to live by depending where
you lived and who controls your daily lives.
Another
Sharia influenced factor is wealth or the creation of wealth. In the Muslim
communities, the affluent hardly ever pay any taxes. In fact, these wealthy
individuals may refuse to pay taxes to our federal government claiming sovereignty
and independent control of their assets and wealth or property. This discouraged
parity and equitable taxation revenue streams and discriminates the rich versus
the poor.
All
traditional schools of Islamic jurisprudence, too, teach subjugation of
non-Muslims through jihad. This will hamper individual governance efforts to be
equal and since it is stemmed from the foundational texts of Islam, it suggests
that it would also stunt development and foster resentment that leads to the
fostering of extremism.
On
the other side of this conflict was a large improvement of educational and
resource development in India that created a higher level of income and
education close to the rest of the western world.
This
perceived disparity could be a driving factor to foster radicalization as one
group pits their hardships or discrimination on another and begin to wage jihad
to restore the inequity of their existence within another country which in this
case is the United States.
Resentment
is often misunderstood for admiration or envy this created conflict leads to
war and violence. In order to provide some parity with Muslim needs or “admiration”
demands, our government would have to invest billions in financing new mosques,
Islamic cultural centers, universities and honor religious texts prepared by
the Muslim clerics to ensure compliance with Islam and Sharia law.
There
are no indications that all Muslims immigrated to the United States would cut
ties with their ancestors or families still in the Middle East or elsewhere in
Europe settling in as refugees just like them. Most local Muslims or their
converts shall likely maintain continuous economical and emotional links with
their past.
Based
upon the previous discussion of Sharia, there should be an inverse correlation between
its popularity and socio-economic development. This is particularly relevant in
Arabic speaking nations, where Sharia is interwoven into the fabric of the
society.
Therefore,
it is not unexpected or altogether surprising that we will see massive
demonstrations by educated young Muslim people frustrated by un-employment, underemployment
in scores of Muslim dominated communities or localities.
Although
the adherence to the strict Sharia laws and Islam practices would deny them the
freedom and privileged others in the United States enjoy, they would be
restricted by law to apply or attain such efforts to break Sharia law and find
jobs suitable to their own taste yet in turn, they will blame the government
form of governance for their lack or socio-economic opportunities and claim mismanagement
towards Muslims.
Specifically,
unless the commerce sector of the United States changes their fundamental means
to produce food, manufacture supplies or equipment, bank with Muslim controlled
financial establishments and other daily commerce transactions, their long term
economic growth will stifle and never achieve long term economic growth
compared to the non-Muslim world even if this world exists within another
world.
No comments:
Post a Comment