Fact: Arizona monitors missed
all negative information related to the conditions of confinement at Kingman
prison. NO apology from the Director for
such most unfortunate oversight.
The director never
said once he was responsible, and willing to hold himself accountable as the
report reflects omissions in reporting facts. Director Ryan’s initial response
was anger – disappointment – disgust – for something that he was not directly
responsible for or was he?
The director offered
a solution to the governor to sever the ties with the prison contractor and the
governor agreed with no blame pointing towards the ADOC for failure to report
these failures. All the finger-pointing was directed at MTC. There was no the
“buck stops here” by director Ryan – he shifted the buck to MTC as the
responsible party for the failures. As a director, he makes all the final
decisions and signs all the relevant policies. He hired five monitors to ensure
it was done so where does the buck really stop and end up?
There was no sign of
humility or humbleness – just arrogance and anger towards MTC. No nobility of
spirit – no full acceptance of the failures as the director of the agency – no
acknowledgment of responsibility.
What should the
director have done?
1.
Admit that he was wrong and that he is sorry
for letting the state down. He
should learn to really own up to what we did or failed to do,
2.
Show us he understands the effect it had on all of us,
the taxpayers and constituents in this state. He showed no empathy - Hint –
maybe no empathy because he surrounds himself with slip-shod sycophantic double
dipping underlings who tell themselves
solely positive news and their own propaganda praise releases.
3.
Tell them what you are going to do
differently in the future so that it doesn’t happen again. Of course, that might not work since they
failed to do the same thing in 2010 when three murders escaped this prison
complex.
Excuse # 1
Director Charles L.
Ryan told reporters when a report on the riots was released Wednesday:
"When you take into consideration what they are to be doing primarily
statutorily, and if information is being withheld from them, I don't know how
you can expect the monitors to read the crystal ball that they're supposed to
know if people are non-communicative,"
Excuse # 2
A report shows five
senior Arizona Department of Corrections officials assigned to monitor
operations at a private prison in Kingman were apparently unaware of brewing
discontent among inmates or massive guard overtime and understaffing before
riots broke out in July.
Excuse # 3
The officers
apparently spent little time interacting with prison staff or prisoners, and
when the officers did, they didn't pick up on the problems. Instead, they spent
the majority of their time inspecting the facility, dealing with inmate
classification and discipline and doing paperwork, jobs required by law that
kept them from picking up on operational issues, according to the report.
Excuse # 4
Corrections Director
Charles Ryan had boosted oversight of the prison in 2010 after three prisoners
escaped, assigning more state staff to oversee operations. He said the
department will now assess the role its monitors play in overseeing its six
private prisons.
So what is the real
motive for cancelling the largest bed contract with MTC? Does this give CCA or
the GEO group (heavily favored by Rep. John Kavanagh) the upper hand and
control the majority share if the bed contracts?
What is leadership?
How can leadership be
so blind?
Does good leadership
make excuses for themselves and refuse to accept responsibility for part of the
blame?
This report is one
culture blaming another culture. MTC (Kingman) is inundated with former ADOC
employees - A counterculture is a group of people whose values, norms, and
behavior clash with those of the prevalent ADOC culture e.g. slip-shod sycophantic double dipping
underlings totally supported by the director’s personal preferences.
A counterculture is a
kind of subculture, a culture within a culture; however, not all subcultures are
countercultures. I believe in this ADOC vs. MTC concept of counterculture there
are significant signs of antagonistic feelings to a dominant culture resulting
in resistance to comply or communicate.
A classic example of
a counterculture is the double-dipping personally re-hired groupies by the
director as well as MTC as a perfect example of counterculture; members of this
counterculture advocated greater executive freedom, political desegregation,
and more rights for themselves than when they were an ADOC employee.
Today, members of the
double-dipping ADOC culture groups exemplify a counterculture because such
groups favor much stronger administrative power than mainstream culture does
putting them above others. Countercultures sometimes meet with passive resistance
from the dominant culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment