We are experiencing a
phenomena known as a “war of attrition” where one side wears down the other
side so they hopefully gain the leverage and change in mindset to accomplish
their goals. This erosion can consist of cultural changes, changing
administrators, rewrite policies and procedures and ignoring previous standards
while creating new ones. This slow corrosion over a set time frame contributes
to the mass or desired number of extermination of targeted groups or people and
can be done through many different strategies such as:
·
A series of administrative personnel changes in
the internal policies and procedures of the agency
·
A series of administrative priorities and objectives
different than before
·
A series of multiple sabotage or covert actions
that are inserted deliberately and timely to cause limited chaos and disorder
·
A series of conflicts or other scuffles that
frustrates veteran staff to resign, retire or take a demotion rather than
dealing with the issues at hand.
An analysis of such an action
shows it is successful and that repeated defeat even on a small scale as
designed will give the assailant leverage and gradually exhaust or expire those
targeted for the purpose of dominance and control. It has been known to create
treasonous conduct, mutiny, desert the fight or demoralize those remaining to
the point their doom is accelerated for doom.
The second impact of such a
war is the public reaction to such actions as it is sold as a means to make
government better or less costly. The mere fact of what this war cost is lost
in the transition to the new plans and rarely challenged.
The only way a war of
attrition can be fought is to fight in common asymmetric warfare where the
rules of engagement change in order to meet the need. Thus the justification is
open to interpretation or transitioning of ideologies that survive this war.
This war consists of attacks
and counter-attacks. There are few concessions along the way and many victims
fall to the process if successful. This strategy is repeated in various
administrative strategies that are repeated over and over until they get what
they want.
In
Arizona Corrections the goal is a workforce reduction of state employees and
the conversion or outsourcing of government services to privatization of related
agency services and public prisons.
No comments:
Post a Comment