Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Prison Director Charles L. Ryan is Complicit with the Republican Party



Ignoring the multiple red flags that have been surfacing since his takeover back in January 2009, what we are witnessing is a prime example how one man, hired by key members of the Republican legislature, has performed or for a better word, underperformed, deliberately under the guiding eye of main players in the party.  A party that is now wanting the people to elect Doug Ducey as the next Republican governor for Arizona.


By design he had become the deliberate obstructionist he was hired to be when he took his oath as the prison agency’s director. Repeated reports gathered since his term began unveiled a strategy, a plan and a mission to allow the Department of Corrections to fail. His leadership style was purposely designed to enact a failing policy that has now cost the citizens of Arizona so much money it is now beyond repair with budget shortages coming up this year. 

Citing report after report showing substandard working and prison conditions he developed a strategy to sabotage our public safety nets related to the incarceration, the management and supervision of prisoners inside our prisons and those on community corrections supervision. His collusion with legislators gave him immunity to criticism and the accountability for his failures. 

To this day, the ADOC has gone nowhere fast. It has failed in every facet of public service and it has been challenged by key media reports but has always rebutted the facts of the incidents with a cleverly cynical argument that plays on the fact that these matters are being looked into, pending investigation, under consideration or there are incomplete factors to consider to seek the truth.

This complicity to refuse to do good government effort and implementing his policies in a committed ineffective manner has been recognized to be the main catalyst in the diminished capacity to provide adequate safety and wellness  for the state’s employees, the legal and moral responsibility to take care and treat the prisoners. 

Strongly supported for this action our state is now facing a class action lawsuit for medical care and other constitutionally provided services, essentially costing Arizona more money than necessary and through a political collusion with the Legislature, provided private prison medical and bed contractors for shoddy but expensive work with profits paid for with taxpayer’s money. 

His deliberate failure to manage his administrators to enforce policies and procedures has resulted in excessive litigation against the state. The irony of this ploy of milking the state for more funding has benefitted only two parties: contractors and lobbyist who knock on these legislators doors and deliver their share of the bargain. 

It would be remiss to mention some kickbacks are in place to further enhance the profit margin but that is only suspect.  Unfortunately this includes the governor’s office as well as the Legislature thereby illustrating how deep this strategy is plotted and seated.
The approach was easily created. First he tampered with employee disciplinary policies, human resource personnel policies and inmate classification policies that rendered the state severely handicapped when it came to alternative spending or prison programming. Since the culture of the state support toxic and harsh punishment of our prisoners none of this was challenged.  

Disregarding best practices adopted by many other states, he made his own rules based on the traditional “lessons learned” ideology that has drifted from the national standards for prisons. This rogue management style makes Arizona 6th in the nation for prison population growth.

Implementing steps to punish employees arbitrarily, he decimated morale of the troops. His policy to change hiring and job classification status to at-will or uncovered put these employees in fear of losing their job nullifying the employee grievance process along the way. 

Applying peer pressure and political pressure from the administrators targeting those staff close to retirement Ryan claimed savings based on attrition rates, vacancies and other strategies that caused a statewide staff shortage and now jeopardizes public safety as the state is experiencing a high rate of turnover. Elimination of essential programs also lowered costs but created designed chaos on the other end of the scale as inmate idleness created security problems.

With the employees under control and using fear and intimidation as his HR tactics to keep them silent he changed the classification policy so the state could send more inmates to private beds for a healthy per diem and a guaranteed set quota which would pay for empty beds promised but not used. He tampered with national accepted “best practices” for custody levels and institutional security needs to allow more inmates to be transferred to private prisons. 

This exploitation of employees is shameful and deliberately fragmented essential services, lowered performance expectations and compromised the quality of security and safety within the prisons. It made great political lines for taking the necessary steps to show management of self-created problems but it hurt the state and it hurt the employees. It will do nothing for Arizona’s ability to recover from the economy but it will make the private prison contractors richer.

Indirectly, because the classification risk assessment tool was no longer similar to original tool once developed on evidence based criteria, the results were poor housing decisions, more violence at the medium custody levels, more staff assaults and more inmates being locked up into the higher and more expensive close and maximum custody. 

Disregarding gang issues, he drove the prison setting into a drug haven, cell phones are plentiful and inmates are continued to be assaulted by gangs as they are trying to do their time. The expensive use of K9 detection dogs have been lend out more to the community than their use inside the prisons allowing contraband to flow freely exist. 

All designed to drive up the cost of our prisons making it a prime reason to privatize them. To say it was operating at a disproportional rate of effectiveness would be an understatement. The lack of balance and the creation of a nonlinear organizational flow to perform the mission has been compromised. 

In the meantime he denied capital outlay budget requests to repair or replace physical plant structures and infrastructures that are near disaster levels now. The agency’s computer infrastructure is outdated creating classification errors as the risk tool is computerized but compromised due to faulty computations of time, severity of crime, erroneous disciplinary histories, and an omission of security concerns not computed by the computer but needs to be inputted manually to reflect the inmate’s actual risk score.

This is an election year. It would be an opportunity to change the guards as matter of speaking for it is time we change leadership in this state. Our state is in deep trouble, our prisons are at the cusp of imploding because of the internal sabotage that has taken place.

Upon hire, Charles L. Ryan walked away from his oath and his duty to serve this state honorably and ethically. He signed on with a selfish legislative cast that hired him to lead the destruction of our prison system. When it explodes, they will all walk way and blame the director but in the end he will be rewarded for doing the job he was hired to do – destroy Arizona prisons and open the door to prison privatization efforts led by these same legislators who hired Ryan.

Endorse Fred DuVal for Arizona Governor’s Race




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Stacey Champion T. 602-788-0033 E. sc@champion-pr.com

Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs and Arizona Correctional Peace Officers Association Endorse Fred DuVal for Arizona Governor’s Race

Two statewide public safety and employee organizations representing thousands of members have endorsed Gubernatorial Candidate Fred DuVal as the best candidate to Protect and Serve.

PHOENIX, ARIZONA, September 16, 2014 – Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs (AZCOPS) with input from their more than one hundred local member associations, and Arizona Correctional Peace Officers Association (AZPOA) representing thousands of state employees, announce today their dual endorsement of Fred Duval for Governor of Arizona.
“Fred DuVal is committed to helping rebuild and fill the many vacancies in law enforcement and corrections left by the recession and massive budget cuts to these agencies. He has vowed to help us protect our hard-earned pensions and stop privatizing our state prisons and education. We believe he is the best man for the job.” said Ed Neidkowski, AZCOPS President.
“We need a Governor who will be looking out for the best interests of our state employees.” adds Tixoc Munoz, AZPOA Executive Director. “Our members care about quality of life; including healthcare, education and job security. Our members, and the people of Arizona, deserve representation that benefits the majority, not a select few.”
Both organizations will be working together to inform and educate their members about the importance of voting for pro public employee candidates like Fred DuVal in the upcoming November general election.
“I am honored to receive the endorsements of these well-respected organizations.” says DuVal. “I look forward to working closely with AZCOPS and AZPOA to improve public safety, law enforcement issues, and making sure our state’s sheriff's deputies and public employees are able to live comfortably after retirement. As governor, I will do my best to make sure their voices are heard.”

My first impressions of Leadership Eminence and Loyalty





One thing I can assure anyone who has served in our armed forces. They were all exposed to unalike kinds of leadership styles and they all bear a meaning to the fact that leadership is something that is acquired rather than being born with. It was Voltaire who said “The right to commandship is no longer an advantage transmitted by nature. Like an inheritance, it is the fruit of labors, the price of courage.”

 Focusing on the “fruits of labors” gives you a sense of direction whether or not a person is born a leader or if they have to work hard at such a challenge in life to exhibit those qualities looked upon by others as someone special and successful based on their trials and tribulations during their life. Although there may be some credence to some certain people were born to lead, it was strongly impressed to me that such personality traits are acquired through time and not at birth. 

The key difference from my perspective is the dissimilarity between a leader and a great leader. The impressions to observe, learn and to be mentored by others greater than me gave me the insight to become successful not because I worked hard but because I paid attention to their traits, successes, failures and mistakes. I realized that whenever they were posed with a challenge, they developed an answer based on their experience of successes and failures and ensuring they didn’t make the same mistake again.

Hence the key is leadership capacity that makes a good leader stand out from the rest of them. The capacity to capture vital leadership characteristics, retain them, use them and continuing to expand or develop them not only with time but with mistakes made and the courage to keep making decisions. Leadership has a position of eminence that carries with it an exceptionally high level of responsibility and accountability. 

The up side of such eminence is the clear evidence such leadership traits draw loyalty and there is no anomaly of loyalty that is unquestionably the kind that instills confidence and positive traits in others who in time become [great] leaders as well. Hence there appears to be a natural chain of events, a set of qualities inherited or empowered to others that makes the tool of leadership vital in the development of men. 

Through time we find the answers to our problems. Through time we gain experience and find different answer than before to the same questions. It is a natural balance of generational growth that fails to isolate not just one trait but rather inherit a host of many personality traits as well as having the knowledge and essential capability qualities which is formulated carefully, filtering out the unsuccessful makings drawn from either historically or from their own past and blend them all together to give you a great leader in the end.

Such cultivation process is a time consuming task but well worth the effort at the end. It gives you mass challenges and opportunities to keep working on it, developing it and applying it. One essential element of success for leadership, whether mediocre, absolute or supreme or rising to the level of excellence is a keen ability and sincere effort to know people. 

Having an interest in people creates the positive dynamics of growth and leads a person down a path of finding the true purpose of what they expect to bring to the problem at hand and hope they have possession of such a skill set to perform the challenges in the manner which makes it successful I nature. 

All the while, they ensure their knowledge, their skills and their experience resonates confidence in others who either follow or are present, they too can possess such traits, qualities and excellence if you take an interest in people and how they do their jobs.
This is not about being flawless or not making mistakes but rather the courage to make decisions which reveal the inner qualities of the decision-maker’s weaknesses and strengths creating a skill set to articulate and communicate good judgment. 

Judgment is an essential traits for leadership that must include failure. The essential ingredient of judgment is experience whether it was a good or bad experience is important but what is more important is to never make the same mistake twice. 

What carries a leader over the top when faced with a problem or dilemma at hand is having the courage to be resourceful, draw strength from their skill set for coming up with the solution to the matter and act decisively and address it with resolve. He or she does not withdraw from the crisis or retreat to limit themselves in participation or engagement and show a clear distinction of their weaknesses. It is exactly at this type of moment in your existence that your reputation is acknowledged and credibility is witnessed.

These elements of positive traits produce a position of eminence which in turn create loyalty. During the exhibition of decision making he or she take into consideration those human qualities or values that carry weight with their followers. 

Human traits such as love, compassion, kindness and equal considerations bring a sense of ownership and belonging to those who believe in this method of cultivating unity and common cause bonding which in turn increases the loyalty amongst those who see the leader make such efforts. 

Loyalty to followers develops loyalty in return. An old saying is that “loyalty begets loyalty” and nothing can break that spirit. Arthur W. Newcomb said “Show me the leader and I will know his men. Show me the men and I will know their leader.
Therefore, to have loyal, efficient employees, be a loyal, efficient employer.” Loyalty is earned but first it must be given. Given to those who are willing to sacrifice at all costs and believe and trust the leader who guides them in war or peace. 

During the war I saw two kinds of leadership taking place right there before me. One is leadership of fear: the other is leadership of encouragement. Both can be effective if they are used at the right time and at the right place. They are both motivators and can cause a heartbeat to skip with excitement or terror. Either way they are blood pumping methods that create the adrenalin rush desired to overcome odds or other human emotions.

Wisdom leads you to realize you can’t use both at the same time. This causes confusion within the rank and file and sends a mixed message. You cannot motivate if they are trembling for the wrong reasons. You cannot encourage if they don’t trust you.

Your actions and body language have to be consistent with you message and your message should be one that unites and not separates the forces. Loyalty to subordinates will be at risk. A leader should be consistent in his approach.